El formalismo del Derecho Internacional frente a su humanización: Sudáfrica contra Israel ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia en el caso relativo a la aplicación de la convención para la prevención y sanción del crimen de genocidio en la franja de Gaza

Libia Arenal

doi:10.36151/reei.47.07

The formalism versus the Humanization of International law: south Africa v. Israel before the International Court of Justice in the case concerning the application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide in the Gaza strip

Authors

Libia Arenal Univesidad de Sevilla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36151/reei.47.07

Keywords:

genocidio; Corte Internacional de Justicia; medidas provisionales; suspensión de operaciones militares

Abstract

This article analyses the request for the indication of provisional measures to the International Court of Justice in the case South Africa v. Israel concerning the application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip in order to infer the reasons why the Court has not considered the suspension of military operations and also to point out what possibilities South Africa has to request this measure again if new facts or circumstances arise from February 2024.

Downloads

PDF (Español (España))

Published

2024-06-21

How to Cite

Arenal, L. (2024). The formalism versus the Humanization of International law: south Africa v. Israel before the International Court of Justice in the case concerning the application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide in the Gaza strip. Revista Electrónica De Estudios Internacionales, (47), 171–209. https://doi.org/10.36151/reei.47.07