Commentary on the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I dated February 5, 2021: the sovereign transfer of prescriptive jurisdiction as the basis for the legitimation of the international punitive system
Keywords:
State, sovereignty, jurisdiction, International Criminal Court, Oslo Accords, occupied territoryAbstract
It has been observed that the judges of the International Criminal Court, in application of the norms of the Treaty of Rome, perform an extensive interpretation of their jurisdiction. Among its resolutions, the Decision issued by Pre-Trial Chamber I of February 5 2021 is no exception to this tendency. In this Resolution, by which authorizes to the Prosecutor's Office to investigate those perpetrators for the commission of international crimes when occurred in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, they base its decision on an autonomous interpretation of the norms established in the Statute of the Court and the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, on the consideration of the fact that Palestine is a State Party for the purposes of the Treaty of Rome. Given the relevance of its grounds, this work analyzes the content of said Decision, as well as the legal positions maintained by the judges who were part of the Chamber, since the exercise of jurisdiction was an essential element of the established punitive system, and from a perspective regulations of international criminal jurisdiction, which can only be consistent with the general norms of international law.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.